⁓ getting computerized feedback consisting of "that's wrong" may or may not constitute "making a mistake"

this randomly sprang into my mind reading > As I’ll argue later in more detail, one only learns by making mistakes. (— ❐ Peripheral Vision﹕ Expertise in Real World Contexts)

what I mean is: having the computer in #project-tpr-board or even #project-karten tell me "nope, wrong" feels very, very different from falling out of a bouldering route

• ...even though #project-tpr-board does at least mimic a #procedural activity
• maybe this is about a kind of "believability" (who are you to judge me, computer program) or lacking skin in the game? but these don't feel super convincing, either

relevant for intentional mistakes/ ⁓ you want a failure machine